Serie A 25/26
Torino
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
67.6
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
67.7
Capability identity 77.9 · complete 80.5
Identity
Vertical / Transition
Confidence 100%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
13.6
Tempo Control · score 9.6 / target 58
This squad is moderately suited to vertical / transition football because it combines Elite ball carrying, Elite secondary box runs, Excellent through-ball threat. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Below-minimum recovery pace; Below-minimum isolation.
- · Overlap Support depends heavily on one player (Marcus Pedersen).
- · Crossing depends heavily on one player (Marcus Pedersen).
- · Width depends heavily on one player (Marcus Pedersen).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Nikola Vlašić
Great Box Crasher
Updated by swap
Primary creator
Gvidas Gineitis
Great Duel Destroyer
Updated by swap
Primary threat
Duván Zapata
Good Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
+5.9%
RHS lean
Was +6.6%
Structural gaps
- Cristiano Biraghi·CBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
- Gvidas Gineitis·LWBWeak fit for this slotHe’s in the XI here, but role form / touch map don’t back this position.
- Samuele Ricci·CMInsufficient data
Style (season, fixed)
Serie A 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Torino, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P16
17/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P42
12/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P11
18/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P95
2/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P84
4/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P11
18/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P21
16/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 18.2% of goals
0.102
14 of 20 · P32 · league med 0.105
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
48.6%
12 of 20 · P42 · league med 50
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
24.8%
18 of 20 · P11 · league med 28.8
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
11.3%
2 of 20 · P95 · league med 7.6
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
44.1%
17 of 20 · P16 · league med 50.4
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
6.7%
4 of 20 · P84 · league med 5.2
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
13.5%
5 of 20 · P79 · league med 11.9
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+5.3
6 of 20 · P74 · league med 1.7
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
119.8
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
16 of 20 · P21 · league med 127.3
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
26.6
16 of 20 · P21 · league med 25
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
23.7
13 of 20 · P37 · league med 22.7
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 15.7 · ground 31.0
48.9%
16 of 20 · P21 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH56 entries · 1607 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
9%
0-15
16%
16-30
14%
31-45
18%
46-60
16%
61-75
27%
76-90+
Conceded %
8%
0-15
21%
16-30
21%
31-45
19%
46-60
19%
61-75
13%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.03
0-15
-0.16
16-30
-0.18
31-45
-0.10
46-60
-0.13
61-75
+0.11
76-90+
44 scored · 63 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+5.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+5.3); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Hamburger SV
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P84 vs P83), Transitions (P95 vs P94), Assisted creation (P42 vs P50).
FC Augsburg
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P16 vs P11), Box threat (P11 vs P17), Directness (P84 vs P78).
Udinese
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Box threat (P11 vs P16), Directness (P84 vs P79), Press proxy (P21 vs P26).