Bundesliga 25/26
Hamburger SV
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
75.7
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
73.9
Capability identity 88.0 · complete 88.3
Identity
Vertical / Transition
Confidence 100%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
44.5
Tempo Control · score 31.5 / target 58
This squad is well suited to vertical / transition football because it combines Elite width, Elite ball carrying, Excellent ball retention. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Limited through-ball threat; Limited defensive transition.
- · Central Playmaking depends heavily on one player (Nicolai Remberg).
- · Box Defending depends heavily on one player (Jordan Torunarigha).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Nicolai Remberg
Great Ball Winner
Primary creator
Jean-Luc Dompé
Great Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Yussuf Poulsen
Good Target Man
Updated by swap
Side bias (current XI)
-9.3%
LHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season, fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Hamburger SV, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P28
14/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P50
10/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P22
15/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P94
2/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P83
4/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P22
15/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P11
17/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 17.5% of goals
0.099
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
47.1%
10 of 19 · P50 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
25.4%
15 of 19 · P22 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
12.0%
2 of 19 · P94 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
45.4%
14 of 19 · P28 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
6.1%
4 of 19 · P83 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
12.1%
10 of 19 · P44 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-7.4
17 of 19 · P11 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
124.2
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
17 of 19 · P11 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
32.2
17 of 19 · P11 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
27.9
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 16.3 · ground 34.1
51.4%
4 of 19 · P83 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH55 entries · 1859 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
8%
0-15
10%
16-30
25%
31-45
23%
46-60
20%
61-75
15%
76-90+
Conceded %
7%
0-15
20%
16-30
19%
31-45
19%
46-60
11%
61-75
24%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.03
0-15
-0.21
16-30
0.00
31-45
-0.03
46-60
+0.06
61-75
-0.21
76-90+
40 scored · 54 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
No wide player assigned on this flank.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-7.4); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Torino
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Directness (P83 vs P84), Transitions (P94 vs P95), Assisted creation (P50 vs P42).
FC Augsburg
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P50 vs P50), Box threat (P22 vs P17), Directness (P83 vs P78).
Udinese
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P28 vs P26), Directness (P83 vs P79), Transitions (P94 vs P89).