Bundesliga 25/26
FC Augsburg
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
69.3
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
73.1
Capability identity 84.0 · complete 86.1
Identity
Vertical / Transition
Confidence 100%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
40.9
Tempo Control · score 29 / target 58
This squad is well suited to vertical / transition football because it combines Elite width, Elite ball carrying, Excellent ball retention. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Limited through-ball threat; Limited recovery pace.
- · Primary Goalscoring depends heavily on one player (Samuel Essende).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Kristijan Jakić
Great Deep-Lying Playmaker
Updated by swap
Primary creator
Fabian Rieder
Good Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Samuel Essende
Good Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
-9.9%
LHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season, fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for FC Augsburg, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P11
16/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P50
9/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P33
13/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P83
4/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P78
5/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P17
16/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P28
14/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 22.2% of goals
0.106
15 of 19 · P22 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
47.1%
9 of 19 · P50 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
26.1%
13 of 19 · P33 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
10.5%
4 of 19 · P83 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
43.9%
16 of 19 · P11 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
5.9%
5 of 19 · P78 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
13.6%
6 of 19 · P72 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-2.9
13 of 19 · P33 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
129.0
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
14 of 19 · P28 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
28.8
11 of 19 · P44 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
28.7
17 of 19 · P11 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 14.8 · ground 33.4
49.1%
11 of 19 · P33 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH49 entries · 1445 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
13%
0-15
13%
16-30
20%
31-45
20%
46-60
11%
61-75
22%
76-90+
Conceded %
13%
0-15
16%
16-30
21%
31-45
18%
46-60
15%
61-75
16%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.06
0-15
-0.12
16-30
-0.12
31-45
-0.06
46-60
-0.12
61-75
0.00
76-90+
45 scored · 61 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (-2.9); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-2.9); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Hamburger SV
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P50 vs P50), Box threat (P17 vs P22), Directness (P78 vs P83).
Torino
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Possession (P11 vs P16), Box threat (P17 vs P11), Directness (P78 vs P84).
Udinese
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Box threat (P17 vs P16), Directness (P78 vs P79), Press proxy (P28 vs P26).