Premier League 25/26
Tottenham Hotspur
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
83.9
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
86.2
Capability identity 89.1 · complete 89.7
Identity
Balanced
Confidence 25%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
36.2
Central Playmaking · score 37.7 / target 78
This squad is well suited to balanced football because it combines Elite defensive coverage, Elite counterpress, Elite box occupation. Main limitations: Below-minimum central playmaking; Below-minimum ball retention; Average recovery pace.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Rodrigo Bentancur
Elite Carrier
Primary creator
Mathys Tel
Great Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Richarlison
Elite Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
+8.7%
RHS lean
Was +10.6%
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season, fixed)
Premier League 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Tottenham Hotspur, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P53
10/20
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P37
13/20
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P84
4/20
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P0
20/20
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P42
12/20
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P68
7/20
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P63
8/20
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 39.6% of goals
—
14 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
44.7%
13 of 20 · P37 · league med 48.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
37.8%
4 of 20 · P84 · league med 32.1
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
—
20 of 20 · P0 · league med 7.1
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
50.3%
10 of 20 · P53 · league med 50.3
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
4.9%
12 of 20 · P42 · league med 8.8
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
12.2%
14 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+4.6
3 of 20 · P89 · league med -1.2
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
153.1
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
8 of 20 · P63 · league med 146.5
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
26.5
7 of 20 · P100 · league med 0
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
24.3
7 of 20 · P100 · league med 0
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 14.9 · ground 38.2
49.1%
14 of 20 · P0 · league med 0
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
38 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH57 entries · 1555 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
38 of 38 matches
Scored %
8%
0-15
10%
16-30
23%
31-45
17%
46-60
15%
61-75
27%
76-90+
Conceded %
12%
0-15
7%
16-30
33%
31-45
9%
46-60
14%
61-75
25%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.08
0-15
+0.03
16-30
-0.21
31-45
+0.08
46-60
-0.03
61-75
-0.03
76-90+
48 scored · 57 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+4.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+4.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Genoa
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P0 vs P0), Press proxy (P63 vs P58), Possession (P53 vs P47).
SC Freiburg
Bundesliga
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P0 vs P0), Possession (P53 vs P50), Assisted creation (P37 vs P28).
Deportivo Alavés
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P37 vs P37), Box threat (P68 vs P68), Press proxy (P63 vs P53).