Bundesliga 25/26
SC Freiburg
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
77.9
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
75.5
Capability identity 85.8 · complete 85.8
Identity
Crossing / Wide Supply
Confidence 55%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
53.8
Central Playmaking · score 37.9 / target 58
This squad is well suited to crossing / wide supply football because it combines Elite wide playmaking, Excellent secondary box runs, Excellent aerial dominance. Main limitations: Limited central playmaking; Average overlap support; Average crossing.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Maximilian Eggestein
Good Carrier
Primary creator
Vincenzo Grifo
Great Playmaking Winger
Primary threat
Junior Adamu
Good Target Man
Side bias (current XI)
-4.3%
LHS lean
Was +1.5%
Structural gaps
- Ritsu Doan·RWInsufficient data
Style (season, fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for SC Freiburg, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P50
10/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P28
14/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P94
2/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P0
19/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P61
8/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P83
4/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P33
13/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 35.3% of goals
0.118
7 of 19 · P67 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
45.9%
14 of 19 · P28 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
38.5%
2 of 19 · P94 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
4.3%
19 of 19 · P0 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
48.0%
10 of 19 · P50 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
5.7%
8 of 19 · P61 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
12.1%
11 of 19 · P44 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+4.5
5 of 19 · P78 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
129.9
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
13 of 19 · P33 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
28.0
9 of 19 · P56 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
24.2
10 of 19 · P50 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 16.9 · ground 32.0
51.5%
3 of 19 · P89 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH55 entries · 1711 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
14%
0-15
12%
16-30
14%
31-45
20%
46-60
18%
61-75
24%
76-90+
Conceded %
11%
0-15
9%
16-30
19%
31-45
30%
46-60
9%
61-75
23%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
+0.03
0-15
+0.03
16-30
-0.12
31-45
-0.21
46-60
+0.12
61-75
-0.03
76-90+
51 scored · 57 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+4.5); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+4.5); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Tottenham Hotspur
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P0 vs P0), Possession (P50 vs P53), Assisted creation (P28 vs P37).
Genoa
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P0 vs P0), Set pieces (P94 vs P95), Directness (P61 vs P58).
Leeds United
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Set pieces (P94 vs P95), Press proxy (P33 vs P26), Directness (P61 vs P53).