Ligue 1 25/26
Le Havre
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
69.6
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
49.7
Capability identity 77.3 · complete 80.7
Identity
Vertical / Transition
Confidence 35%
Strongest capability
98.5
Secondary Box Runs
Biggest gap
0.0
Primary Goalscoring · score 0 / target 68
This squad is moderately suited to vertical / transition football because it combines Elite width, Elite secondary box runs, Excellent ball retention. Main limitations: Below-minimum primary goalscoring; Below-minimum central progression; Below-minimum tempo control.
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Abdoulaye Touré
Good Deep-Lying Playmaker
Updated by swap
Primary creator
Enzo Koffi
Good Duelist Winger
Primary threat
—
Updated by swap
Side bias (current XI)
-28.4%
LHS lean
Was -19.7%
Structural gaps
- Junior Mwanga·AMInsufficient data
- Josué Casimir·RWInsufficient data
Style (season, fixed)
Ligue 1 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for Le Havre, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P45
12/21
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P45
12/21
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P70
7/21
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P55
10/21
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P75
6/21
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P40
13/21
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P50
11/21
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 18.8% of goals
0.109
13 of 21 · P40 · league med 0.112
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
48.0%
12 of 21 · P45 · league med 50.3
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
28.2%
7 of 21 · P70 · league med 26.1
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
7.5%
10 of 21 · P55 · league med 7.4
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
46.8%
12 of 21 · P45 · league med 47
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
5.9%
6 of 21 · P75 · league med 4.9
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
12.7%
6 of 21 · P75 · league med 11.2
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
-6.5
19 of 21 · P10 · league med 1.2
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
141.8
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
11 of 21 · P50 · league med 141.8
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
25.6
17 of 21 · P20 · league med 22.5
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
25.9
19 of 21 · P10 · league med 22.1
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 14.6 · ground 36.7
51.7%
2 of 21 · P95 · league med 50.1
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH51 entries · 1911 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
13%
0-15
13%
16-30
19%
31-45
16%
46-60
22%
61-75
19%
76-90+
Conceded %
14%
0-15
14%
16-30
25%
31-45
14%
46-60
14%
61-75
20%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.06
0-15
-0.06
16-30
-0.15
31-45
-0.03
46-60
+0.03
61-75
-0.09
76-90+
32 scored · 44 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
No wide player assigned on this flank.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (-6.5); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Metz
Ligue 1
Closest axes
Closest on Box threat (P40 vs P35), Press proxy (P50 vs P45), Set pieces (P70 vs P65).
Bologna
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P55 vs P47), Set pieces (P70 vs P58), Box threat (P40 vs P53).
Deportivo Alavés
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Set pieces (P70 vs P68), Press proxy (P50 vs P53), Assisted creation (P45 vs P37).