Bundesliga 25/26
1. FC Heidenheim
Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy, style metrics stay on season aggregates.
Interactive pitch
Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.
Bench
Team Synergy
Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.
Team strength
74.4
Mean primary-role quality of this XI
Synergy
69.8
Capability identity 84.1 · complete 86.6
Identity
Low Block
Confidence 70%
Strongest capability
100.0
Ball Carrying
Biggest gap
38.0
Recovery Defending · score 45.9 / target 88
This squad is well suited to low block football because it combines Elite defensive coverage, Elite reading, Excellent primary goalscoring. Main limitations: Below-minimum recovery defending; Limited rotational flexibility; Limited box defending.
- · Reading depends heavily on one player (Patrick Mainka).
- · Box Defending depends heavily on one player (Patrick Mainka).
Personnel (live)
Recomputed from current XI selection, role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.
Progression hub
Niklas Dorsch
Great Deep-Lying Playmaker
Primary creator
Adrian Beck
Great Carrier
Updated by swap
Primary threat
Sirlord Conteh
Limited Target Man
Updated by swap
Side bias (current XI)
-2.5%
LHS lean
No structural gaps in current XI.
Style (season, fixed)
Bundesliga 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.
Team identity
League-percentile style fingerprint for 1. FC Heidenheim, shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.
Possession
Ball possession vs league
P6
18/19
Assisted creation
Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross
P11
17/19
Set pieces
Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP
P83
3/19
Transitions
Fast-break shot share
P56
9/19
Directness
Accurate long balls / passes
P94
2/19
Box threat
In-box shot share (six-yard + box)
P39
12/19
Press proxy
Defensive actions per opp possession
P17
16/19
Dashed ring = league median (P50)
Attack shape
Attack →
Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).
Mean xG / shot
Set-piece goals 34.1% of goals
0.125
5 of 19 · P78 · league med 0.114
How chances are created
Share of season shots by situation, not a quality score.
Assisted shot %
% of shots after a teammate pass/cross
41.1%
17 of 19 · P11 · league med 47.1
Set-piece shot %
Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces
37.8%
3 of 19 · P83 · league med 29.4
Fast-break shot %
Share of shots from transitions
8.0%
9 of 19 · P56 · league med 7.9
On the ball
Possession
Avg ball possession
42.2%
18 of 19 · P6 · league med 48
Long-ball rate
Accurate long balls / passes
7.7%
2 of 19 · P94 · league med 5.5
Final-third entries
Final-third entries / passes
14.8%
3 of 19 · P89 · league med 12.1
Side bias
Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)
+5.5
4 of 19 · P83 · league med -1
Without the ball
Defensive actions / opp poss
Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession
125.2
medium confidence, proxy, not PPDA
16 of 19 · P17 · league med 140
Clearances / match
Team clearances per game
32.7
18 of 19 · P6 · league med 28.3
Opp touches in box
Opponent penalty-area touches / match
29.4
18 of 19 · P6 · league med 24.2
Duel win %
Won/match · aerial 17.0 · ground 30.2
49.1%
12 of 19 · P33 · league med 49.9
Game State
Historical next-goal tendency · lead protection · chasing response , same engine as Match Preview
34 matches · 100% coverage
Level
HIGH56 entries · 1514 min in state
Goal timing
When goals arrive across the match clock · scored % · conceded % · net per window
34 of 34 matches
Scored %
10%
0-15
15%
16-30
15%
31-45
17%
46-60
17%
61-75
27%
76-90+
Conceded %
7%
0-15
15%
16-30
24%
31-45
18%
46-60
15%
61-75
21%
76-90+
Net / match (window only)
-0.03
0-15
-0.15
16-30
-0.32
31-45
-0.18
46-60
-0.12
61-75
-0.12
76-90+
41 scored · 72 conceded · stoppage (90+) in 76–90+
Cross-layer insights (interpretive)
Anchored to season side bias, not updated by pitch swaps.
Team side bias near central (+5.5); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Team side bias near central (+5.5); flank fit is not strongly directional.
Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.
Similar teams
Style shape vs top-5 leagues, 25/26, cosine similarity of the Team Identity radar percentiles (Possession, Assisted creation, Set pieces, Transitions, Directness, Box threat, Press proxy). Formation is context only and does not affect the score.
Lecce
Serie A
Closest axes
Closest on Assisted creation (P11 vs P11), Directness (P94 vs P95), Transitions (P56 vs P58).
Levante UD
La Liga
Closest axes
Closest on Box threat (P39 vs P37), Directness (P94 vs P89), Possession (P6 vs P11).
Everton
PL 25/26
Closest axes
Closest on Transitions (P56 vs P53), Press proxy (P17 vs P21), Directness (P94 vs P100).